Bad manners dates 2016
“FDA should adopt a less burdensome definition of dietary fiber,” lawyers for the American Bakers Association wrote in an April petition. 30 executive order, which requires government agencies to rescind two rules for each rule promulgated.
(A representative of the ABA declined to comment.) The FDA has given little indication of how it will respond to the industry requests.
The requests are directed at an administration that has embarked on the largest regulatory rollback in decades, axing rules that oversaw big banks, oil companies and elementary schools.In a statement, FDA spokeswoman Deborah Kotz said that the agency was aware of industry concerns about fiber, menu-labeling and the new Nutrition Facts panels, and that it was carefully reviewing them. With regard to menu labels — the most time-sensitive of the three issues flagged by industry — Kotz said that “the FDA is aware of the concerns on the part of many entities …the agency is taking these concerns seriously as it considers how to best fulfill its public health mission while minimizing regulatory burdens.” Asked at the Grocery Manufacturers Association meeting whether he expected the administration’s anti-regulatory mood to delay food and nutrition rules, Mickey Parish, a senior adviser in the FDA’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, said only that the FDA had “been asked to take a look at our regulations, we’ve been asked to review things, which we are doing, and we will continue to do that.” He closed his slide deck with a quote from baseball player Yogi Berra: “Prediction is always difficult, especially about the future.” If there are questions about the future, he told the audience, “I don’t know, I’m not going to answer.” Despite that lack of clarity, public health groups are mobilizing to oppose possible rollbacks and delays.And in his written responses to questions from the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, Gottlieb said his FDA would seek to balance questions of nutrition disclosure against business interests.“As a general matter, I support providing clear, accurate, and understandable information to American consumers to help inform healthy dietary choices,” Gottlieb wrote, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post. However, I am mindful of the unique challenges that developing and communicating such information can pose, particularly on small, independent businesses.” The menu-label provision, which passed as part of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, applies to a range of establishments that serve hot food, including restaurants, cafeterias, grocery stores and movie theaters, provided that they have 20 or more locations.
Search for Bad manners dates 2016:
[Why the sugar industry hates the FDA’s new Nutrition Facts label] In mid-March, an alliance of 17 major food industry groups — including those representing the juice, dairy and sweetener industries — sent a letter to Price, urging a three-year delay, to 2021, “to ease regulatory burden on the economy.” “Food and beverage manufacturers are committed to giving consumers information and tools they need to make informed choices, and that includes making the necessary changes to the Nutrition Facts Panel,” said Roger Lowe, a spokesman for the Grocery Manufacturers Association. we believe there is a more efficient and less costly approach regulators can take to execute these label changes.” The Trump administration appears receptive.